From Cairo to Kayoro FROM
CAIRO
TO
KAYORO

Bringing Reproductive Health to a Village in Ghana

A PERSONAL ESSAY BY
MARGARET CATLEY-CARLSON
POPULATION COUNCIL


 

Table of Contents

Introduction

In Cairo, two major messages:

In Kayoro:

How relevant?

Nurses on motorbikes

Village conclaves

Women choose contraceptives

Female excision decreases

Conversations about disease prevention are rare

Moving Kayoro through the fertility transition

Impact of population momentum

Women's lives must improve

Conversation with Kayoro chief

Suggested Readings

About the Author

Download entire speech as a pdf file

In Kayoro: very poor, isolated, male dominated, and pronatalist

The other "Cairo"—Kayoro—is a settlement located in one of the poorest areas of the world, in northern Ghana close to the border with Burkina Faso. It is an hour’s rough jeep ride on unpaved roads from Navrongo, where the Population Council has been working with the Ghanaian government to study health and related issues since 1994. Navrongo is the only town nearby with electrification, telephone service, and paved roads. Kayoro is a patrilineal/patriarchal society headed by a chief, who is paramount along with nine other chiefs. The Kayoro population is traditional, agrarian, rural, isolated, and impoverished. Over 80 percent of adults are illiterate. Kayoro villagers are definitely among the one billion people globally who live on the equivalent of less than $1 per day.

How can women with so little power exercise the reproductive rights Cairo said was their birthright?

In Kayoro, male dominance is assured by marriage custom and one-third of families are polygynous. Many women marry in their teens and there is a large age difference between spouses. Women are viewed—and view themselves—as the property of males. Domestic power relationships assure male control over family resources and health-seeking decisions; in fact, all decisionmaking abilities are vested in males. Religion is traditional and includes ancestor worship. Soothsayers control the access to ancestors.Of course, only men can consult soothsayers.

The society is pronatalist and women have on average more than five children in their lifetime. With high levels of infant and child mortality, about one in four children do not see their fifth birthday. Infectious diseases and diseases of malnutrition are prevalent. Although immunization has had its successes, many can remember measles epidemics that wiped out all of the children within certain families. Children are seen as one of the main purposes of life, essential to carrying on the ancestral lineage. Women without children are seen as being punished by the gods and ancestors. Wifebeating is common, expected, and sanctioned.

In such a poor society, can integrated reproductive health and family planning services be made available? Can they reach women who have little or no personal mobility? In such a strong traditional society, where marital and kinship customs diminish the reproductive autonomy of individuals, what kinds of policies are needed to legitimize family planning services? How can women with so little power exercise the reproductive rights Cairo said was their birthright?


 

Back  Back   || Back to the Cairo + 5 page ||   Next   Forward