Peru:
Leadership Facilitates Sustainability of Postabortion Care Services
OR Summary no. 42
|
Abstract: At a major Peruvian teaching hospital, improvements in postabortion
care were sustained for three years with local funds after they were
introduced during an experimental intervention. Strong commitment by
hospital and MOH leadership, combined with adequate infrastructure and
skilled staff, contributed to the institutionalization of the postabortion
services. |
Background
In 1996 the Peruvian
Ministry of Health (MOH), Ipas, and the Population Council tested an
improved postabortion care (PAC) model at the Hospital Carrión in Lima.
The two-year intervention included training to improve clinical care, a
switch from sharp curettage to manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for
treatment of incomplete abortion, provision of family planning information
and methods, and service reorganization to provide PAC as an outpatient
service and to concentrate services in the obstetrics-gynecology (OB-GYN)
emergency room. Significant service improvements and cost savings resulted
from the intervention, and the MOH and Ipas began replication of the
service in hospitals in other states.
In 2000 with support from
FRONTIERS, Ipas conducted an evaluation study to assess the sustainability
of the improvements made during the original intervention. Services were
considered sustainable if they had been incorporated as routine hospital
practices and continued without external support. The study examined four
major aspects of the changes: (1) clinical care, including the use of MVA;
(2) provision of family planning information and methods following PAC
services; (3) provision of medical care information to clients; and (4)
costs to the hospital and clients. Data were collected through review of
clinical records, exit interviews with 119 PAC clients, a patient flow
analysis, a supplies and equipment audit (or inventory), and in-depth
interviews with providers and policymakers. Data from 2000 were compared
to pre- and post-intervention data obtained during the 1996 study.
Findings
-
Overall, the changes in
PAC services have been maintained or improved since the 1996
intervention, with resulting benefits to both the hospital and
postabortion clients. MVA has replaced sharp curettage for treatment of
virtually all medically appropriate cases of incomplete abortion. In
2000, hospital records showed that MVA use was maintained for an average
of 99 percent of patients.
-
Provision of family
planning information and methods increased steadily as PAC services
became routine. Nearly three quarters of clients interviewed during the
follow-up reported that they had received information about the risk of
an immediate pregnancy, and nearly 90 percent received family planning
information and obtained a method (see Table).
Percentage (%) of postabortion clients who received family planning
information and methods
Service
|
Pre-
intervention
1996
|
Post- intervention
1997
|
Follow-up
2000
|
|
|
n=102 |
n=102 |
n=119 |
|
Informed about
risk of immediate pregnancy |
38 |
65 |
72 |
|
Received family planning information |
18 |
78 |
89* |
|
Received
contraceptive method |
2
|
59
|
87*
|
|
*p<.05 at
post-intervention and follow-up stages |
-
Close to two-thirds of
postabortion clients (62%) at follow-up reported that they had been
informed about the treatment they needed—a significant improvement over
pre-intervention proportions (10%). However, less than one-third of
clients at follow-up received information on major warning signs such as
severe pain and bleeding.
-
Pain management was
inadequate during the intervention and remained inadequate at follow-up.
About two-thirds of postabortion clients received light sedation during
treatment, and one-third received a combination of medications such as
sedation and a paracervical block. However, few patients received pain
medication before or after treatment.
-
The time PAC clients
spent in the hospital diminished markedly over time. The concentration
of services in the OB-GYN emergency room, combined with the shift to
outpatient PAC services, reduced the length of stay from 33.3 hours to
6.4 hours post-intervention, and to 6.7 hours at follow-up. Time spent
waiting for services dropped from 5.3 hours before the intervention to
2.9 hours after, and averaged 2.6 hours at follow-up.
-
Following the
introduction of MVA and outpatient treatment for postabortion cases, per
patient costs to the hospital dropped from $118.73 to $45.13, and
declined further to $33.45 at follow-up. Out-of-pocket expenses for
patients (including admission, treatment fees, medications and some
supplies) declined from $52.98 before to $37.40 after the intervention.
At the time of the 2000 follow-up, clients’ costs averaged $32.75. The
hospital is recovering over 80 percent of the full cost of providing PAC
services as compared to less than half (45%) prior to the intervention.
Policy Implications
-
Strong support and
commitment from both hospital leadership and the MOH helped establish
the improved PAC services as an element of routine care. Motivation for
change also came from the reduced length of patient stay and related
hospital costs. Within the hospital’s staff, replication of the original
training on MVA use and counseling sustained the skills to perform the
procedure and maintain high-quality care.
-
Dissemination of the
findings on the benefits of the new model convinced reluctant staff
members of the value of the new PAC services. Broader dissemination of
the findings in Peru and in other Latin American countries resulted in
recognition of the “Hospital Carrión model.” This external recognition
and a feeling of “ownership” on the part of hospital staff further
reinforced the improvements.
January 2004
Source: Benson, Janie and
Victor Huapaya. 2002. "Sustainability of postabortion care in Peru,"
FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council. (PDF,
685 KB)
This project was conducted with support from the U.S. AGENCY FOR
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT under Cooperative Agreement Number
HRN-A-00-98-00012-00
For more information contact: Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS) Population Council 4301 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 280 Washington, DC 20008 USA Telephone: +1 202 237 9400 Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410 E-mail:
frontiers@popcouncil.org
|