|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: A broad-based educational program developed in Senegal by Tostan and adapted in Burkina Faso increased awareness of human rights and women’s health, and reduced support for female genital cutting (FGC). Public discussion of FGC leads to change in traditional social norms. |
Background
![]() |
|
Woman calls out the names of all the communities taking part in the public declaration ceremony renouncing FGC. Photo credit: Population Council/Dakar |
The government of Burkina Faso is committed
to the improvement of women’s
reproductive health. Within this context, the Population Council’s FRONTIERS
Program collaborated with two nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs), Tostan
in Senegal and Mwangaza Action in Burkina Faso, to replicate the
Tostan
community-based education program. Originally developed in Senegal (see
FRONTIERS OR Summary no. 54), this program provides modules in local languages on hygiene, problem
solving,
women’s health, and human rights as a
means of promoting community
empowerment
to facilitate social change.
The intervention, implemented from 2000 to 2003 in the provinces of Bazega and Zoundwéogo in Burkina Faso with funding from the GTZ Supra Regional Project for the Elimination of FGC, compared the performance of 23 participating villages with that of 23 control villages. Overall, 578 women and 448 men participated in the program.
To measure the program’s impact on awareness, attitudes, and behavior regarding reproductive health and FGC, researchers conducted pre- and post-intervention surveys of women and men in the intervention and control areas, and qualitative interviews with key community members (including village chiefs and nurses). To measure the diffusion of knowledge, researchers also surveyed men and women who lived in the intervention area but did not participate in the study. They also assessed pre-and post-intervention changes in the number of girls under 10 who had been cut.
Findings
About two-thirds of the participants (63% of the
women and 60% of men) attended all four modules of the educational
program. The main reasons for not taking part in the full program were
travel and lack of time, illness and pregnancy. The women’s health and
hygiene modules had the highest attendance (over 70%), while the human
rights and problem-solving module had the lowest (25% and 18%).
Knowledge of the negative consequences of FGC,
already strong at baseline, increased significantly among female (82% to
97%) and male (85% to 97%) participants.
Disapproval of FGC increased significantly among
men and women in the intervention area, reaching 98 percent; however
little change was seen in the control area (see table below). The proportion
of female participants expressing regret at having their daughter cut
significantly increased after the intervention (53% to 81%). There was
no significant change among nonparticipants or among women in the
control area.
The proportion of girls aged 10 and under who had
been cut decreased (from 6% at baseline to 3% among intervention
participant families and 1% among nonparticipating families), but
remained unchanged at 4 percent in the comparison group.
In 2003, representatives of 34 villages in the intervention area participated in a public declaration denouncing FGC and early marriage, and affirming their intention to protect the health of women and children. The majority of participants (66% of women and 74% of men) took part in the ceremony, which was widely known in the intervention area and attended by over 5,000 people. A larger proportion of male nonparticipants attended the ceremony than women (53% versus 27%).
Attitudes of women and men toward FGC
|
Intervention group |
Comparison group |
||||
|
Baseline |
Endline | Baseline | Endline | ||
|
Participant |
Nonparticipant |
||||
| Women (n) |
6622 |
578 |
167 | 226 | 228 |
| Disapprove of FGC | 89 | 98* | 91 | 90 | 94 |
| FGC violates women’s rights | — | 99* | 98 | 97 | 96 |
| Men (n) | 697 | 448 | 169 | 227 | 229 |
| Disapprove of FGC | 90 | 98* | 95* | 93 | 89 |
| FGC violates women’s rights | — | 96* | 72 |
— |
73 |
| * p<0.05 | |||||
Policy Implications
The community-based education program can be
successfully adapted and replicated in new settings, facilitating
broad scale-up in diverse settings with high prevalence of FGC.
There is considerable demand for both educational activities and public discussion of FGC and related health issues in the community, suggesting the acceptability of social change efforts on sensitive health topics.
June 2005
Source: Diop, Nafissatou J., Djingri Ouoba, Zakari Congo, Molly Melching, Baya Banza, Georges Guiella, and Inge Baumgarten. 2004. "Experience from a community-based education program in Burkina Faso: The Tostan program," FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council. (PDF, 1.5 MB)
See
also “Senegal: Community education program increases dialogue on FGC,”
FRONTIERS OR Summary no. 54. Washington, DC: Population Council,
2005. (full text)
This project was conducted with support from the U.S. AGENCY FOR
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT under Cooperative Agreement Number
HRN-A-00-98-00012-00.
For more information contact:
Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS)
Population Council
4301 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 280
Washington, DC 20008 USA
Telephone: +1 202 237 9400
Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410
E-mail:
frontiers@popcouncil.org
|
Print this page |
This page updated |