|
| |||||||
|
||||||||
| Abstract: The introduction and promotion of the lactation amenorrhea method for birth spacing improved women’s understanding and use of the method, but knowledge of essential factors remained insufficient. Continued government support of breastfeeding and endorsement of lactation amenorrhea could increase the rate of correct use and enhance health benefits. |
Background
In 1997 the government of Kazakhstan reversed an outdated policy of promoting artificial feeding for newborns. The new national policy promotes breastfeeding for improved maternal and child health. In addition to providing developmental benefits for newborns, exclusive breastfeeding suppresses fertility for up to six months, thus serving as a natural and easily learned birth spacing method during this period. However, data on the impact of policy initiatives on breastfeeding and postpartum lactation amenorrhea were lacking. Beginning in 2000, FRONTIERS supported a two-year operations research project by the Kazakh Academy of Preventive Medicine to test an intervention to improve knowledge and use of the lactation amenorrhea method (LAM) for birth spacing during the first six months postpartum.
The intervention consisted of training staff at four hospitals to provide counseling on the benefits and behavioral requirements of LAM as a family planning method. Five hospitals serving similar populations were used as comparison sites; in these sites, providers received no extra training. Both intervention and control groups included “Baby-Friendly” hospitals (certified through the Baby-Friendly program, conducted by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund, which also includes breastfeeding training) as well as “ordinary” (noncertified) hospitals. To test the intervention’s impact, researchers interviewed 3,969 postpartum women in the nine hospitals and observed their breastfeeding habits. They also conducted eight follow-up interviews with each enrolled mother over a period of 12 months. Indicators included women’s knowledge and efficiency of LAM use, outcomes in terms of birth spacing, and differences between LAM practices in Baby-Friendly certified and ordinary hospitals.
Findings
The intervention increased the likelihood that
women would receive LAM counseling. Almost three times more women
reported receiving LAM counseling in the experimental Baby-Friendly
hospitals (BFHs) and ordinary hospitals (OHs) (82% and 41%,
respectively) than in the corresponding control hospitals (33% and 13%).
Women in the BFHs—both intervention and
control—scored higher than women in ordinary hospitals on almost every
indicator of knowledge, attitude, and skills of breastfeeding. The
intervention BFHs outperformed the other hospitals on LAM practices
(breastfeeding within 30 minutes of delivery and infant rooming with
the mother).
Over half of all women interviewed said that they intended to use LAM. However, significantly fewer women knew all three essential criteria (first six months postpartum, during amenorrhea, and full breastfeeding). Knowledge of these three criteria is critical for effective LAM use. Significantly more women in the intervention hospitals knew all three criteria versus women in the control hospitals (see figure).
![]() |
Follow-up interviews showed that actual LAM use was
low during the first month postpartum (less than 10%). LAM use increased
over time, with 78 percent of women reporting using LAM by the third
month.
LAM use significantly affected amenorrhea rates
(the absence of menstruation). At six months postpartum, the absolute
numbers of LAM users and nonusers were roughly equivalent (2,391 and
2,628, respectively) but amenorrhea rates differed dramatically (98%
versus 19%).
The rate of new pregnancies among women at all hospitals 12 months postpartum was low (under 1%). Of the 165 pregnancies that did occur, only eight were among LAM users. No women in the experimental BFHs became pregnant. None of the LAM users who knew all three criteria of successful LAM use became pregnant.
Utilization
Policy Implications
Women’s acceptance of breastfeeding in this setting reflects the importance of government support for beneficial health practices. Where such support exists, the Baby-Friendly model should be offered, combined with LAM training and public outreach, to enhance the use of LAM as an effective, low-cost postpartum contraceptive method.
January 2006
Source: Tazhibayev,
Shamil et al. 2004. "Promotion of lactation amenorrhea method
intervention trial, Kazakhstan," FRONTIERS Final Report.
Washington, DC: Population Council. (PDF,
826 KB)
This project was conducted with support from the U.S. AGENCY FOR
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT under Cooperative Agreement Number
HRN-A-00-98-00012-00.
For more information contact:
Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS)
Population Council
4301 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 280
Washington, DC 20008 USA
Telephone: +1 202 237 9400
Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410
E-mail:
frontiers@popcouncil.org
|
Print this page |
This page updated |