|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: An integrated model for post-rape care by nurses in a rural district hospital, which included a designated room for medical management and guidelines for providing reproductive health and HIV services, improved the quality of care provided. However, nurses remained reluctant to collect forensic evidence that could be used for prosecuting perpetrators. |
Background
South Africa has developed a strong policy framework outlining medical management of rape survivors, which includes provision of HIV testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and emergency contraception, ideally within 72 hours. However, implementation has been hampered by numerous obstacles, both in health care infrastructure and policy, and in linkages between medical care and criminal justice services.
|
Quality of care given to rape survivors, pre- and post-intervention (chart review) |
|||
|
Quality of care indicators |
Pre-intervention (n=161) | Post-intervention (n=173) | |
| Pregnancy prevention | Preg test given | 68% | 86% |
| EC given | 65% | 73% | |
| STI | STI meds given | 88% | 92% |
| VCT and PEP | Any VCT done | 60% | 87% |
| VCT on first visit | 41% | 61% | |
| Any PEP given | 48% | 72% | |
| 28 days given on first visit | 15% | 55% | |
| Anti-emetics given | 30% | 45% | |
| Referrals | Other providers | 19% | 46% |
To address these issues, in 2004 FRONTIERS collaborated with the Rural AIDS and Development Action Research Programme (RADAR) of the University of the Witwatersrand and the Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre (TLAC) to develop and test a strengthened and integrated model for post-rape treatment. The study was implemented in a 450-bed district hospital serving a large rural population in Mpumalanga province. The intervention comprised five elements: (1) establishing a sexual violence advisory committee at the hospital; (2) instituting a hospital policy for rape management; (3) training clinicians, police, and social workers on post-rape care; (4) centralizing and coordinating post-rape care through a designated outpatient room; and (5) a community awareness campaign.
To assess the intervention’s effectiveness, researchers conducted interviews with over 50 health care workers, pharmacists, police, and other service providers at the baseline and midway through the study. Quality of care was assessed through a review of 334 hospital charts and interviews with 109 rape survivors.
Findings
Quality of care improved significantly after the model was implemented. Provision of voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) and PEP showed particular improvement, with over three times as many survivors receiving a full 28-day supply of PEP at the first visit (see table). This was also reflected in a three-fold increase in patients reporting adherence to the full PEP regimen. Rape survivors had significantly more positive views of hospital services, staff attitudes, and counseling after the intervention.
Consolidation of all rape-related treatments in one room led to increased service efficiency. The proportion of survivors who reported seeing six or more providers decreased from 86 to 54 percent.
Nurses were able to provide high-quality medical management of post-rape cases, including documenting the rape history, providing and counseling on PEP and other medications, and making follow-up referrals. Many nurses were reluctant to learn and implement the forensic examination, citing a lack of clarity regarding their legal ability to testify in court if needed.
The majority (76%) of survivors reported to the police before coming to the hospital—both before and after the intervention—and most (80%) presented to the hospital within 72 hours, and were thus eligible for medical treatment.
One-quarter of those presenting were children younger than age 14 and about one-half were under age 18. Several rape survivors were male.
Utilization
Policy Implications
January 2008
Source: Kim, Julia, Lufuno Mokwena, Ennica Ntlemo, Ntabozuko Dwane, Amanda Noholoza, Tanya Abramsky, Edmore Marinda, Ian Askew, Jane Chege, Saiqa Mullick, Liesl Gerntholtz, Lisa Vetten, and Anneke Meerkotter. 2007. “Developing an integrated model for post-rape care and HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in rural South Africa,” FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council. (PDF)
This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. HRN-A-00-98-00012-00. The contents are the responsibility of the FRONTIERS Program and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
For more information contact:
Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS)
Population Council
4301 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 280
Washington, DC 20008 USA
Telephone: +1 202 237 9400
Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410
E-mail:
frontiers@popcouncil.org
|
Print this page |
This page updated |