|
| |||||
|
| Abstract: In Burkina Faso, a variety of strategies—including enforcement of a law against excision, strong government support for programs encouraging the abandonment of FGM/C, and debates in the mass media—led to widespread declarations of intention to abandon FGM/C. However, ensuring the sustainability of these gains will require long-term commitment from the government and from programs that seek the abandonment of FGM/C. |
Background
In 2006, the Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS) program collaborated with the National Committee Against the Practice of FGM/C (known by its French acronym of CNLPE) on an analysis of recent trends in female genital mutilation/circumcision (FGM/C) in rural and urban Burkina Faso. The study, conducted to help develop policies and programs for FGM/C abandonment in and beyond Burkina Faso, had three components: a description of the institutional, political, and programmatic environment in Burkina; a secondary analysis of data from existing studies; and an assessment of the community’s perceptions and behavior regarding FGM/C, as well as the factors that contribute to its abandonment or continuation.
Declaration of women’s and children’s rights, Burkina Faso.
Photo credit: Population Council/Dakar

For the policy review, researchers collected national and international documents on laws related to FGC, as well as studies and evaluation reports from several intervention programs, and visited three courts to observe judicial procedures and penalties for FGM/C cases. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 28 stakeholders.
The secondary analysis examined 11 quantitative and five qualitative studies. To assess community perceptions and behaviors, researchers conducted 44 focus group discussions and 85 in-depth interviews in five provinces.
Findings
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS3) completed by UNICEF in 2006 show that the prevalence of FGM/C has declined to 59 percent among women aged 15–49 (down from 77 percent reported in the 2003 Demographic and Health Survey or DHS). The prevalence among girls under age 10 is 50 percent lower than among older women.
Ethnicity and place of residence are strong factors in FGM/C. Girls from the Peulh, Bobo, and Samo ethnic groups are 2.4–7 times more likely to be cut than those from the Gourounsi, Mossi, Goin-Senufo, Lobi-Dagara, and Gourmanche ethnic groups. Girls who live with their mothers in rural areas are 1.2 times more likely to be cut than girls in urban areas.
Qualitative research showed a decrease in FGM/C and in support for the practice. It appears that more girls are reaching the age of marriage without being cut, and that communities in the areas studied understand the harmful consequences of FGM/C. Songs and dances celebrating excision appear to have disappeared. Government health workers report that fewer expectant or new young mothers have been cut.
Factors Influencing FGM/C Decline
Numerous factors have contributed to the declining practice of FGM/C. Major elements include the following:
However, clandestine excisions continue; and most older informants still support FGM/C. Factors supporting continuation of the practice include deep convictions about the practice of FGM/C and continuing myths or beliefs about the clitoris and about the “uncontrollable” sexual drives of uncut girls.
Very young girls, between ages 1 and 5, may now be at greater risk, in part because they are more likely to be compliant and can be cut in secret. DHS figures from 1999 and 2003 show a 13 percent increase in FGM/C practiced on girls aged 0–5 (from 54% to 61%). Cutting is most likely to take place during the rainy season, when people are busy with farming; and some families migrate to facilitate cutting.
Utilization
Policy Implications
January 2008
Source: Diop, Nafissatou J. et al. 2008. “Analyse de l’evolution de la pratique de l’exision au Burkina Faso [Analysis of the evolution of the practice of excision in Burkina Faso],” FRONTIERS Final Report. Washington, DC: Population Council.
This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. HRN-A-00-98-00012-00. The contents are the responsibility of the FRONTIERS
program and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
For more information contact:
Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS)
Population Council
4301 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 280
Washington, DC 20008 USA
Telephone: +1 202 237 9400
Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410
E-mail:
frontiers@popcouncil.org
|
Print this page |
This page updated |