Horizons > Horizons Report > June 2003

June 2003

Workers participating in a water exchange excercise

During a workplace HIV/AIDS education session, Thai workers
participate in a water exchange exercise to show how the virus spreads.

Photo credit: TBCA

Employers and company managers have an important role to play in creating work environments free from AIDS-related stigma and discrimination. Implementing HIV/AIDS policies in the workplace can curb unfair employment practices, such as compulsory HIV testing, and encourage employers to accommodate the needs of people living with HIV/AIDS.

ASO Workplace Policies and Programs

To gain the basic 5 percent reduction and/or the certificate, the companies had to implement three key policies:

  • No HIV/AIDS testing for applicants seeking employment.
  • No HIV/AIDS testing for current employees.
  • Allow employees known to be HIV-positive to continue working.

Further reductions of up to 10 percent were awarded to companies that demonstrated a comprehensive workplace HIV/AIDS program for employees by:

  • Informing their employees of the company’s HIV/AIDS policies.
  • Maintaining the confidentiality of the HIV status of employees.
  • Providing assistance to HIV-positive employees.
  • Providing training and information on HIV/AIDS to employees, including the promotion and distribution of condoms.
  • Becoming involved with HIV/AIDS activities in the wider community.

In Thailand, a recently completed Horizons study examined the role of financial and other forms of incentives in encouraging companies to adopt workplace policies that reduce HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination. The research was conducted in partnership with American International Assurance (AIA), Thailand’s largest insurance provider, the Thailand Business Coalition on AIDS (TBCA), and AusAID.

Researchers investigated company managers’ responses to different recruitment incentives, including financial enticements and public recognition. For example, AIA offered its member companies reductions of 5 to 10 percent off their group life insurance premiums for employees if they agreed to implement the HIV/AIDS workplace policies identified by the initiative known as the AIDS-response Standard organization (ASO) (see sidebar). As the initiative evolved, researchers introduced the additional incentive of a certificate endorsed by the Ministry of Public Health and awarded at a high-profile public ceremony.

The research team assessed the HIV/AIDS programs and policies of each company that agreed to participate, which determined an evaluation score. TBCA then offered practical assistance to help each company improve its score, which most of the companies accepted. This included leaflets on HIV/AIDS prevention and where to seek help, videos and a mobile exhibition to show employees, condoms for distribution to employees, peer education training, advice, referrals to support groups, and assistance with writing company HIV/AIDS policies.

Obstacles to Participation

Between August 2000 and May 2001, 857 companies in the Bangkok and Chiang Mai metropolitan areas were invited to join ASO. After publicizing the initiative at a press conference, TBCA staff provided company managers with information and nurtured relationships with them, including one-on-one meetings to explain and promote the advantages of ASO.

But six months after the start of the project, it become clear that recruiting companies was going to be more difficult than expected. Participation was then extended to companies without AIA life insurance policies that could thus not benefit from the insurance premium reductions but would receive the certificate honoring their actions. A total of 125 companies, including factories, hotels, and commercial and professional firms, signed up; of these, 42 companies (34 percent) held AIA group life insurance policies and were entitled to the insurance reduction.

The most important incentive for most companies was an altruistic one: the opportunity to act in the best interests of their employees.

To find out why more companies had not joined during the recruitment process, researchers sent out surveys to managers from all the companies that had either accepted or declined the invitation to join and received responses from 245 firms.

Some managers said that the process of joining was too complicated, or that the benefits of signing up would not be worth the financial and personnel resources required to comply with ASO. In some cases, an inappropriate decision-maker had been contacted. Researchers also discovered that some managers had declined to join because they suspected the incentive scheme was an AIA marketing ploy. This indicates that plans for future scale-up of this program must explain that the scheme is not linked to promotion of any particular insurance company.

Why Participate?

An examination of the incentives offered to employers revealed some surprising results. Researchers found that neither the financial incentive nor the certificate had motivated most managers to sign on to the initiative. Only 11 percent of managers said that they had joined ASO for its financial benefits.

Peer educators demonstrating the correct way to put on a condom

Thai workers get hands-on experience during a condom use demonstration.

Photo credit: TBCA

In fact, the actual amount of potential savings proved insufficient to act as an incentive, considering the time and effort required to implement the policies. With life insurance coverage costing employers an average premium of 250 baht (US$5.85) per employee, the maximum reduction available was 25 baht ($.60) per employee. AIA member companies joining ASO ranged from five to 1,600 employees, with possible annual premium reductions ranging from under $2 to $937.

“To be honest, it is only a small amount,” said the manager of a large company that did not join ASO. “It would be time consuming and complicated.”

Nor did the certificate provide sufficient motivation for even a single manager to participate in ASO.

“Our hotel has so many [certificates] that I do not know where to put them,” said the manager of a large company that joined ASO. “I am not interested in the certificate unless it came from someone really important.”

According to some respondents, one way to improve the appeal of the certificate could be to secure the sponsorship of the Thai royal family or of a prestigious patron, such as the United Nations or the International Labor Organization, to distinguish the certificate from many similar awards.

Doing the Right Thing

For most of the companies surveyed, the most important incentive was an altruistic one: the opportunity to act in the best interests of their employees. Nearly 60 percent of the managers whose companies joined ASO explained that they participated because they felt a sense of responsibility to both their workers and to the wider community in which their companies operate.

“The incentive for private enterprises to be involved in the fight against AIDS is not simply about money or certificates, but about us giving our workers greater knowledge and providing them with additional training,” said one manager of a large company that joined ASO.

The actual amount of potential savings was insufficient to act as an incentive, considering the time and effort required to implement the policies.

Another motivation to join the initiative was that it would allow companies to find out how their HIV/AIDS policies and programs compare to those of other companies, and, more fundamentally, better understand the disease and how their employees’ behavior puts them at risk.

“Managers are very concerned about whether they are doing the right thing for their workers in relation to HIV/AIDS and have many questions,” said Dr. Anthony Pramualratana, executive director of TBCA. “These managers are keen to listen to us, and once we provide them with information about the disease, they develop policies and programs to help their workers.”

TBCA has received funding from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria to expand ASO into workplaces in 25 provinces, in cooperation with local nongovernmental organizations. A final report on the study will be available later in 2003.

Return to Table of ContentsNext article >


© 2003 The Population Council, Inc.



For additional information please contact: 
Horizons 
Population Council 
4301 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 280 
Washington, DC 20008
Telephone: +1 202 237 9400 
Facsimile: +1 202 237 8410 
E-mail: horizons@popcouncil.org 



This page updated
19 October 2007

  
Publications/Resources

"Using incentives to encourage AIDS programs and policies in the workplace: A study of feasibility and impact in Thailand," Horizons Final Report (2004) (PDF, 520KB)

“The role of incentives in encouraging workplace HIV/AIDS policies and programs,” Horizons Research Summary (2003) (document)

"Linking insurance rate bonuses to improvements in workplace HIV/AIDS programs in Thailand," Horizons Research Update (2002)(document)

More Horizons publications on the workplace

 
June 2003
Horizons Report

HIV/AIDS Workplace Programs
Mobilizing managers, crafting policies, educating workers

"Getting Your Heart Free"
Openly HIV-positive, a young South African serves as a model to workers

Reaching Highly Mobile Workers with HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs
Vietnam-based study examines impact of peer education, motivating management

Doing the Right Thing for Employees
In Thailand, study finds worker health is greatest incentive to adopt HIV/AIDS workplace policies  

Studies in Brief
Succession Planning Helps HIV-affected Families Prepare for the Future (Luwero and Tororo, Uganda)   

Testing a Tool to Strengthen RTI Control Programs (Brazil, Cambodia, Ghana and Latvia)

PDF Version (373 KB)