van de Wijgert, Janneke H.H.M., Peter H. Kilmarx, Heidi E. Jones,
John M. Karon, and Supaporn Chaikummao. 2008. "Differentiating normal from
abnormal rates of genital epithelial findings in vaginal microbicide
trials," Contraception 77(2): 122–129. (offsite
link)
Background
Candidate vaginal microbicides could cause genital irritation, which in turn
could facilitate HIV transmission instead of preventing it. While genital
epithelial findings are documented in a standardized manner in most
microbicide trials, little is known about background rates and predictors
for many types of genital findings.
Study design
A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a Phase II expanded
safety study of the candidate microbicide Carraguard® gel (Population
Council, NY, USA) in Thailand. Genital findings were identified by visual
inspection of the cervix, vaginal walls, and external genitalia during pelvic
exams prior to gel use (screening and enrollment) and during gel use (at 2
weeks and months 1–12). Women were interviewed about potential risk factors
for genital findings at every visit and tested routinely for sexually
transmitted and vaginal infections.
Results
A total of 258 genital findings were identified in 152 woman-years of
follow-up. Genital findings were positively associated with older age,
increased parity, self-report of genital symptoms, positive HSV-2 serology,
bacterial vaginosis by Nugent scoring, and the presence of a genital finding
at baseline. Furthermore, vaginal findings were positively associated with
vaginal practices and yeast infections. Genital findings were negatively
associated with use of hormonal contraception, inconsistently associated
with frequency of sex and applicator use, and not associated with condom
use.
Conclusions
Several factors that are common in women of reproductive age account for the
background rate of genital epithelial findings in this population.
Return to Microbicides
Publications/Resources page