Silverman, Jay G., Michele R. Decker, Niranjan Saggurti, Donta
Balaiah, and Anita Raj. 2008. "Intimate partner violence and HIV infection
among married Indian women," Journal of the American Medical Association
300(6): 703–710. (offsite
link)
Context
Despite reductions in prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection among the general population of India, women account for a rising
percentage of all HIV cases with husbands' risk behavior described as the
major source of women's infection. Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been
described as being associated with heterosexual transmission of HIV to women
in India and elsewhere.
Objective
To assess the relationship between experiencing IPV and the occurrence of
HIV infection in a nationally representative sample of married Indian women
tested for HIV.
Design, setting, and participants
The Indian National Family Health Survey 3 was conducted across all Indian
states in 2005 through 2006. The nationally representative sample included
124,385 married women; analyses conducted in 2007 and 2008 were limited to
28,139 married women who provided IPV data and HIV test results via
systematic selection into respective subsamples.
Main outcome measures
Prevalence estimates of lifetime IPV and HIV infection were calculated and
demographic differences assessed. Intimate partner violence was
conceptualized as physical violence with or without sexual violence and then
was further categorized as physical violence only vs physical and sexual
violence. Regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and
95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HIV infection among Indian women based on
experiences of IPV after adjusting for demographics and women's HIV risk
behaviors.
Results
One-third of married Indian women (35.49%) reported experiencing physical
IPV with or without sexual violence from their husbands; 7.68% reported both
physical and sexual IPV; and 27.80% reported experiencing physical IPV in
the absence of sexual violence. Approximately 1 in 450 women (0.22%) tested
positive for HIV. In adjusted models, married Indian women experiencing both
physical and sexual violence from husbands demonstrated elevated HIV
infection prevalence versus those not experiencing IPV (0.73% vs. 0.19%; adjusted
OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.41–10.94; P=0.01). Physical IPV alone was not
associated with risk of HIV infection. Women's personal sexual risk
behaviors were not associated with HIV infection.
Conclusions
Among married Indian women, physical violence combined with sexual violence
from husbands was associated with an increased prevalence of HIV infection.
Prevention of IPV may augment efforts to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS.
Return to Gender-based Violence
Publications/Resources page