van de Wijgert, Janneke, Lydia Altini,
Heidi Jones, Alana de Kock, Taryn Young, Anna L. Williamson, Anwar
Hoosen, and Nicol Coetzee. 2006. "Two methods of self-sampling compared to
clinician sampling to detect reproductive tract infections in Gugulethu,
South Africa," Sexually Transmitted Diseases 33(8): 516–523.
Objectives
To assess the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of two methods of
self-sampling compared to clinician sampling during a speculum examination.
Goal
To improve screening for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in
resource-poor settings.
Study design
In a public clinic in Cape Town, 450 women underwent a speculum examination
and were randomized to self-sample with either a tampon or vaginal swabs.
All specimens were tested for the same pathogens using the same diagnostic
tests.
Results
Self-sampling resulted in satisfactory validity for N. gonorrhoeae,
C. trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis, and Candida species (tampons and swabs)
and high-risk human papillomavirus (swabs only) when tested with molecular
tests or microscopy, but not for T. vaginalis by culture. Self-sampling was
feasible and acceptable, but some women preferred speculum examinations,
which allow the clinician to view the vagina and cervix.
Conclusions
Although self-sampling should not replace speculum examinations in all
circumstances, it should be explored further as an RTI screening strategy.
Return to