| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 2005, Vol. 11, No. 1Demography Nostalgia for the “good old days,” a familiar sentiment in the developed world, may be common in the developing world as well. Recent research in Bangladesh and the Indian state of West Bengal has revealed that, despite well-documented progress in health and an acknowledged improvement in child mortality rates, many rural Bengalis firmly believe that adult health and survival have declined in recent years. Demographers Sajeda Amin, of the Population Council, and Alaka Malwade Basu, of Cornell University, encountered this attitude while conducting interviews on women’s and men’s motivations for reproduction. They were intrigued and decided to further explore this surprising worldview. The data analyzed in this study were drawn from a larger study of reproductive change. The researchers conducted 32 focus-group discussions, each with six to ten rural respondents of the same sex and religion, in nine rural districts (four in Bangladesh and five in West Bengal). Contradictory perceptions In virtually every interview the researchers conducted, however, they found that the respondents believed that adults today die earlier than they did in their fathers’ and grandfathers’ time. Nearly all the respondents identified a decline in food quality and quantity, along with population growth and moral degeneration, as causes for this drop in longevity. The respondents stated that because of population growth, less food is available than in the past. Food is also less healthful now because it is produced for the market rather than for subsistence. Hence, it is grown with less care and with poisonous fertilizers and pesticides. Furthermore, the lifestyle required for producing marketable food leads to stress, which in turn leads to illness and such risky behaviors as drug abuse, contended respondents. In the past, interviewees asserted, people were more God-fearing and pious. The past was not just a time of abundant, healthful food; it was also a time when people were “good.” The researchers point to several possible explanations for this outlook. Memories of famines and disease epidemics could have contributed to a general perception that survival is threatened. Or, the bare subsistence experienced by many respondents could compare poorly with the lifestyle of abundance and indulgence depicted in local folklore and mythology. Improvements in skill with numbers and mathematics may account for some of the feeling that people are not living as long as in the past. Today, if a recently deceased man is known to have been 60 years old at his death, he will be thought to have died young in comparison to his forebears who are believed incorrectly to have lived to be 80, 90, and 100. Finally, the moral decline often mentioned by respondents suggests that apprehensions about modern lifestyles may explain the perceived increase in adult mortality. Children are too young to be held morally accountable. Therefore, it is justifiable to appreciate the survival advantages that modernity has afforded them. But the moral degeneration of adults can only be endured if it is accompanied by some kind of punishment, such as decreased survival. Consequences of this outlook This worldview may also influence the way that women and children are treated in society. “On the one hand, if people believe they have little to lose, they may be more permissive with women and children and allow riskier behavior,” says Amin. “On the other hand, if people think the world is more risky and ‘bad,’ they may be more protective and less apt to give women and children freedoms.” Source Outside funding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||